Skip navigation links

 COURSES  > 2005 MONDAY ECC 71300 002: [2929] > CONTROL PANEL > DISCUSSION BOARD > ELLIOT EISNER

End navigation links

 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 53 

Date: 08-22-2005 11:50

Author:

Subject Please comment on Eisner

Remove


Please comment on Eisner

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 32 

Date: 08-29-2005 17:13

Author: Toth, John <>

Subject reading

Modify Remove


What does Eisner have to say about the the arts:

Malissa brings up a good point about the success that comes from having multipl solutions to problems.

Nicole & Barbara have tapped into the core of the problem that goes back to early childhood where we first begin to sense failure. This is what the test does, it measures failure in pursuit of an impossible ABSOLUTE excelence that is determined from the outset; nothing new is generated. Only knowledge APPLIED becomes a truth. The Arts confirm this, as facts are generated into a new creation.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 42 

Date: 08-29-2005 21:55

Author: <>

Subject Response to Eisner

Remove


A part of Eisner's article stood out to me: the idea of art as a metaphor for life.  Art, like life, is not definitive.  There is no "one way" but many paths, open to a variety of interpretations.  How are our children supposed to understand the ins and outs of life if they are learning that there is only one concrete answer for every problem?

Art teaches valuable lessons: understanding "cultures," solving problems, creating new solution, etc.  Art opens the mind to endless possibilities.  It helps to understand all aspects of our lives.  It serves as a journey of discovery.  Art is about learning new things, having a broader perspective of the world, life, and ourselves as individuals.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 30 

Date: 09-01-2005 11:54

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


After reading The Misunderstandood Role of the Arts in Human Development, I couldn't help feeling defeated. You see, I have NEVER excelled in Mathematics and/or science and because of this "failure" I spent my adolescence  feeling subpar.  My strengths have ALWAYS lied in the performing arts. It wasn't until I attended Ithaca College and studied theater, that I felt validated.  I always new that the science geeks (pardon the expression) were missing the "big picture". My inability to solve specific mathematical equations and or scientific experiments only strengthened my ability to "think outside the box, " read people, and develop strong interpersonal skills."  When Eisner discusses the fact that "no teacher has direct access to a child's mind, it is the child's  ability to see the connections..."  - this idea, to me, is so poweful. My experience with teachers was so linear, either you got it or you didn't. I truely believe my teachers thought they knew what was going on inside my mind - and that it should have been DIRECTLY linked to theirs - SCARY! As a new teacher, I want to create an environment for my students that fosters creativity, "thinking outside the box", nuturing the idea that most of the time, in life, there are infinite ways to achive a goal, and/or solve a problem. Those are the values I want my kindergarteners to leave my classroom with. Intelligence is NOT measured by one's ability to excel in the sciences, we must put more weight in our artistic, expresive students! While looking back on my elementary school years, my teachers did not value the areas of academia that I flurished in, it was disregarded. My feeling of defeat after reading this article lies in the fact that I know this close-mindedness will continue and negatively impact so many talented, interesting young minds.  My hope is that I can make a positive impact on my future students!

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 31 

Date: 09-01-2005 15:51

Author: A <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


When reading Eisner's The Misunderstood Role of  the Arts in Human Development  I was having flashbacks to my youth, and could hear my father's voice, pontificating on the extreme importance of math, logic and science.  I, not being naturally inclined towards any of those things, learned to gain his approval but "putting forth my best effort."  Looking back at the days in parochial school I recall how different classrooms were then.  We all sat in rows of desk, hardly interacting with each other, and learned from lectures and textbooks and worksheets.  My art classes, when we had them (not often or regularly)  were not much different - I recall our art teacher showing us a project and asking us to re-create it - there were no skill taught or creativity expressed.  The only students who excelled were those projects were those whose parents sent them to art classes on the weekends. 

That being said, what I have seen in the classroom today is so different and reminds me of the things Eisner discusses in point number 3, supporting his belief that the "having fixed objectives and perusing clear cut methods of achieving them are not always the most rational ways of dealing with the world."    While I agree that we try to plan and teach in a logical, manufactured way I do think that some of the methods of process and assessment being implemented today support the needs of individual children and celebrate the differences in the way they learn and express themselves.  For instance, Everyday Math, a curriculum used in the public schools, trains teachers to find out how students get their answers and understand they way their brains work.  The set up of many classrooms, which often use cooperative learning groups, allows students to learn from each other and be flexible.  The use of portfolio's for assessment also allow for more freedom and expression in a student's work.  The use of the arts in the classroom is so common in early childhood, which I do believe benefits children in all of the ways Eisner discusses.  While our education system is not perfect (may never be!) I do believe we have made great strides since I went to school and I hope that we can continue to make it even better.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 29 

Date: 09-04-2005 20:01

Author: <>

Attachment (23552 bytes)

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


See attachment

 

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 27 

Date: 09-05-2005 18:48

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


In the article " The Misunderstood Role of the Arts in Human Development" by Elliot W. Eisner, he identifies common core contributions of the arts. The first contribution was "not all problems have single, correct answers. This statement interests me because I never realized how in most subjects students are taught there is only one correct answer or solution. "The last thing a modern teacher of the arts in America wants is a class full of standarized performances on a given task." This is what is so great about art. Students will always have different perceptions about art. They will have different interpretations about art work. There is not one single correct answer as to what one should feel when looking at a piece of art. Or why the artist used certain colors. Art is so impotrant for students to take in school because it gives them the opportunity to explore their imagination, to express how their feeling.

Now that Im a teacher, I get excited about doing art in my classroom because it is something that I used to enjoy as a child. For me, art was always that one subject where I did not have to worry about anything and just have fun. After reading Eisners article I realized I loved art as child because art gave me the freedom to draw my own conclusions. Whatever project or drawing I did, there was never something I could of done wrong.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 25 

Date: 09-06-2005 16:20

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


     While reading "The Misunderstood Role of Arts in Human Development" by Elliot Eisner, I saw that I wholeheartedly agree with him. There is not enough emphasis of the importance of art in our education system. We should donate more time teaching them about art. Art brings about imagination and fosters multiple perspectives. I definitely agree with the statement, "not all problems have one correct answer." As children we are taught that one plus one equals two. I believe that mathematics is very important but it does not foster our imagination and it does not give us multiple perspectives on life.

     Art is one the best ways for a child to express one's self. I tend to believe that art is a part of language. It helps us think and use our ideas and imagination. Some of the greatest professional and business people are successful because they used their imagination to come up with great ideas. We as adults should know that there is not only one solution to our problems that we face in life.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 20 

Date: 09-07-2005 17:22

Author: <>

Subject reponse to article

Remove


My take on the article: In the article by, Eisner, he really brings about key points, that all educators should keep in mind. I have a BA in Human Development, and throughout college, i took classes, that were mind- enhancing, and creative, and they made me really ponder life's most critical issues. But not through tests, more through discussions, art, and essay's. As Eisner point's out so many teacher's are trying to teach kid's to know what is correct on a test, choice A, or choice B. Not how they found the answer, or what their opinion is. Art has so many facets, that each student can use art to enhance the way they think, and the way they interact with others. Understanding human beings, and the way our minds tick, and the way each person deals with different situations, are lifes lessons, and challenges. As Eiser has portrayed throughout the article, that discovering one's unquiness, and intellect is very important, and we must try to incorporate creativiity and imaginiation within today's society, and its future.

My response to

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 19 

Date: 09-07-2005 17:23

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


I agree completely, i love to do art now, and decorate my classroom, there is so much creativity within ourselves, that we can teach the children, to be artists in their own way.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 19 

Date: 09-07-2005 18:41

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


 I agree with Eisner  how important and vital it is for schools to incorporate Art into their curriculum.  When creativity and imagination are not nurtured, a child's cognitive growth is definitely limited. Children are naturally curious and inquisitive. A child must be given the oppourtunity to discover, experiment, and learn that there may be more than one way, answer or solution to a problem or situation. Art allows this to happens. It helps an individual become more well rounded, creative and flexible. 

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 15 

Date: 09-09-2005 08:42

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


I found that Eisner clearly articulated alot of the problems that exist in art education today and enjoyed reading it.  As an elementary student, I had an art teacher who would model a project for us and then gave us the opportunity to recreate.  Although, it was always a fun task, I cannot help but wonder if it limited us by not allowing us to expand our own thought and creativity. 

While student teaching over the summer, I disgustedly watched a teacher criticize a young students attempt at a teacher directed project.  The child has fine motor development issues and when the work of art did not look the same as the teachers, she made him throw it out and begin again. 

Even as I signed up for this course, I was intimidated (and still am) because of my own fears of not being a creative person.  I once read that children lose their creativity by the age of 5 as they are forced to conform and "think inside the box."  Eisner effectively postulated the important need for strong arts education to develop all aspects of child development.  

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 16 

Date: 09-09-2005 12:09

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


In response to Shari...the FUN of learning is what will engage our students the most, particularly in early childhood.  And what can kids do?  Play, color, draw, dance, sing, frolic and paint.  The arts are FUN, not only for the teacher, but for the students, and that is our in-road to getting them to love learning.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 16 

Date: 09-09-2005 12:14

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


I entirely agree with you, Nicole, but I might suggest that we not put more weight on our artistic and expressive students, but rather try to incorporate art and expression into the learning and the curriculum for all the students.  It is the process of learning through the arts from which a child will most benefit, regardless of his or her natural inclinations.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 23 

Date: 09-09-2005 12:23

Author: <>

Subject Re: reading

Remove


I think after reading all the responses and the article, it is clear that most of us see the value of incorporation of arts into a classroom, but I feel we mustn't disregard all traditional learning, as it is our basis for most adult functioning.  Speaking as someone who did function well in the traditional classroom, but became an artist, those traditional skills certainly helped me in my educational career as well as my employment.  The arts in a classroom MUST be there, especially in early childhood where the arts remains the language of children, but the realities of our system as it is dictate that we have to address the math, the science, the semiotics... the "single-answer" world.  So how do we do this using artistic and expressive techniques?  THIS is an exciting and important question that I think Elliot Eisner would be very interested in exploring.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 15 

Date: 09-09-2005 22:56

Author: <>

Subject Response to Eisner

Remove


I agreed with Eisner on the fact that art should be part of the curriculum in all schools.  During elementary school, I don't recall doing much art work, except for the holidays when we created a card for our loved ones. When I entered high school, I was introduced to photography, and I loved it. I was able to express myself like I never had before. It was amazing; I especially like creating black and white prints. I was really touched by Eisner's quote: "The arts, however, teach the child that the grass is not simply green; it is lavender, grey, gold. And when it is green, its varieties are endless." This is how I felt everytime that I developed my own photos (my own master piece).  The whole process of selecting a scene or event to capture in a photograph took a lot work, but also a lot dedication.  By not including the arts in a child's life, we limit their abilities to explore and learn. Eisner said that there is no single correct answer in art, which is totally true. When ever I show my pictures to someone, they see something totally different from what I tried to portray. This is great because their view, as well as mine, is correct. This just proves that we live in a world of endless possibilities.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 15 

Date: 09-09-2005 23:10

Author: <>

Subject Re: reading

Remove


I agree with you, Michael. Even though curriculum should include art, they should also include other subjects like Math, Science, English, etc.  By including all these areas, we give children choices. Just like they can succeed in life as an artist, they can also decide to be a teacher or an accountant. Like I mentioned in my response, this is a world full of endless possibilities.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 16 

Date: 09-10-2005 13:44

Author: <>

Subject Re: replying to Elliot Eisner

Remove


After reading "The Misunderstood Role of Arts in Education," I believe art should be part of every school's curriculum, especially early childhood programs.  Art promotes language and fosters imagination and expression. Even though art can provide these attributes, it is not considered important because many schools are failing because children are not passing citywide math and reading exams.  Classroom teachers and schools are emphasizing more time to literacy and math.  Therefore, art is pushed aside and it is not considered priority.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 12 

Date: 09-11-2005 18:05

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


I agree with Eisner that art is a major component in a childs education. We do not expose it to children enough. Everthing that is being taught in school now is test taking skills that requires a single correct answer. We do not let children think outside of the box. After reading Eisner's article, I feel that I need to reevaluate my ways of teaching in the classroom and to include as much art as possible.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 13 

Date: 09-11-2005 20:32

Author <>

Subject Re: reading

Remove


Eisner states that the arts do play a significant role in the human development.  That language and thought are intertwined with each other.  I always thought about art, music, writing, and poetry as not that important for education until going to college.  I then realized how much thinking and thought went into music, art, and writing.  Just like Dewey said: "Words are easily manipulated in mechanical ways, the productions of a work of genuine art probably demands more intelligence than does most of the so-called thinking that goes on among those who pride themselves on being "intellectuals._  When I read that, I thought wow that is so true.  Furthermore, I realized that schoolchildren are trained to be good followers, but are not trained to think for themselves when the answer is not black or white, but grey.  Eisner says, _The arts teach a different lesson_, which in life things do happen and there might not be a single correct answer. I came to the realization that fine arts is not just important to children, but to adults too.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 12 

Date: 09-11-2005 20:53

Author: <>

Subject Re: reading

Remove


I agree that i use to think that Art, Music and physical education were not as important as other subjects in school until i got oldier and had to take an art class as well in college.  It completly changed my thought on teaching art in schools.  I was always afraid in art that my work was not good enough or i was going to be laughed at since i am not a good drawer or painter.  I hid my work and got fustrated when i tried to complete my assignments.  I was not proud of my product once i saw the other students pieces, than i learned that there is no right or wrong way as long as you created it and gave it your all. 

Art is a form that is created by the artist and means something to them.  It expresses feelings and emotions, and i think it is  great for children to be able to have an opportunity to express themselves in that form.  Children have so much pressure placed on them with all these new mandated tests that they loose sight of why they are learning certain things. In art class they can let go and create pieces out of fun and how they feel.  They learn that there work is wondeful because it is their creation.  My students have art three times a week and i strongly agree with that.  It teaches them so many different things and i really believe it helps their creativity, confidence, and socializations skills.  My students love to share with eachother their work becuase they know that what they create is their own work and there is no set rules when it comes to creating art. 

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 11 

Date: 09-11-2005 20:55

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner

Remove


I agree that art really enhances children's learning by letting them think outside the box.  It gets their minds working and helps to get them engaged in the work.  I try to incorporate art into my english class since that is what i teach as much as possible and they really are more engaged in the lesson when art is included. 

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 14 

Date: 09-11-2005 21:07

Author: <>

Subject Re: reading

Remove


I agree that the arts are not emphasized to be as important as the other academice subjects such as science, math or english and others but the arts is just as important to the development of the mind as those other subjects. According to Eisner, art fosters expression and discovery where there is no single right answer or solution to a problem. It is a process of communication with the medium and it develops the childrens imagination and gives them possibility to experiment with different ideas.
Therefore i also agree that the arts should be given the same value and allocated the same amount of time as the other subjects.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 10 

Date: 09-11-2005 22:46

Author: <>

Subject "What kind of culture do we prize?"

Remove


This was a quote from reading that I think is important to consider. Not only does art reflect artist's feelings about society, but the children's feelings. Through learning about the "language of the line", we can learn about our students through their art. Are they happy? Are they upset? They may not tell you, but their art might. In addition, many people suggest that strengthening one domain will strengthen others. For instance, encouraging art may boost a child's creativity. As a response, he or she may use this creativity in a number of different mediums. For instance, he or she may become creative with conflict resolution, problem solving, or inventing. In our competitive world, creativity is what moves us forward. Art has an important role in this progress and it should not be overlooked.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 10 

Date: 09-12-2005 13:11

Author: <>

Subject Re: reading

Remove


Michael says "The arts in a classroom MUST be there, especially in early childhood where the arts remains the language of children."  That statement is so important not just for the really young children who are unable to express themselves fully since they have not yet acquired the vocabulary and language to express their thoughts and feelings but also to those that are new to the english language and cannot express themselves fully because of their limited grasp on the language.  Having a medium to express yourself that is free is unbelievably powerful because it not only lets the artist create and express themselves but it allows others to see and understand the artist in a way they were unable to due to the limits that hinder them.

In the school where I work, the curriculum is heavy on the academics but it also has a spectacular arts program.  You can see the confidence of the children build as they perform in the various arts program.  Each grade has something different and as they move through the different grade levels they experience new forms of art from regular music classes, to cooking, learning about different musical instruments and composing songs, chorus, learning to play the violin, dancing and putting on a show with the NDI program, Rosie's Broadway Kids and ballroom dancing.  As they go through these art programs the children become more self assured, self confident and outspoken as well as gaining a more rounded experience in their education.  Creating and performing in a show gives the students such an amazing sense of accomplishment and a sense of pride and is truly an experience that every child should have the opportunity to go through.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 7 

Date: 09-17-2005 19:28

Author: <>

Subject My response to Eisner...

Remove


I have not yet read through every posting, as I felt compelled to add my bit...

I believe that a child can retain information that has been presented to him/her much quicker when more than one area of the brain has been engaged.  By allowing a child to participate in the arts, the child will be able to utilize what he/she has discovered through experimentation and apply it to the different disciplines taught in schools.  For example, a child, who can physically blend the colors yellow and blue to make green, will truly comprehend the concept of primary and secondary colors.  I believe that the education system is completely amiss by not permitting children to foster their creative development in school.

As a teacher, I agree with the point that "not all problems have single, correct answers."  My love of teaching stems from my belief that there can be multiple ways to solve a problem as well.  For example, we know that 3+3=6.  However, through trials, we understand that 4+2=6, as well as 5+1.  By allowing children to participate in such experimentation, we are helping them understand information, which has been presented to them, on a much deeper level.

Post reply


 

Forum: Elliot Eisner

Times Read: 9 

Date: 12-04-2005 20:39

Author: <>

Subject Re: Please comment on Eisner